Back to previous issue Forward to next issue
MCC News, Issue 2, March 1997
General Election special
Move over Question Time and the Today programme... MCC News is the forum for hot political debate on what matters most. We quizzed the main local general election candidates on what they could offer Merton cyclists if elected and how they stood on the Safeway superstore plan for Plough Lane in Wimbledon. Here's the line-up for both constituencies - Wimbledon and Mitcham & Morden - in no particular order. Contributions have been edited for reasons of space and clarity.
WIMBLEDON
Charles
Goodson-Wickes (current MP - Con)
As a parliamentary private secretary in the Dept of Transport and as someone who has regularly cycled in London, I have a particular concern for Merton Cycling Campaign. Indeed, I helped arrange a visit by the Minister for Transport in London to Merton so that he could see the traffic difficulties and the facilities provided for cyclists. I am conscious of the fact that the full route has yet to be completed and that, for example, negotiations are under way with Railtrack in the area of Raynes Park station. I have worked closely with the police and planning authorities to ensure an appropriate mix of modes of transport, with the needs of cyclists high on the agenda. I look forward to the completion of the London Cycle Network and have always taken up the concerns of my cycling constituents with enthusiasm.
Safeway: I have consistently questioned the need for such a store. I would have much preferred a mix of low-cost housing and light industrial use."
Roger
Casale (Lab)
In government, Labour's policy will be to reverse the growth of traffic by encouraging cycling, walking, greater use of public transport and the carriage of long-haul freight by train. Locally, for example, Labour will continue to work for the extension of cycle routes. Under a Labour government the council will be able to raise money for cycle paths from local parking fees. The paths will also be integrated into the national network. If elected, I will make sure that this work continues in consultation with residents and partner organisations such as MCC.
Safeway: Sustainable development was written out of our local unitary development plan at the insistence of the government. So it was difficult for the council to turn the Safeway proposal down. However, if elected, I will continue to work with organisations such as the London Planning Advisory Committee and the local environment forum for sustainable development. For example, I contacted LPAC about the Safeway application and am pleased the application has been called in.
Alison
Willott (Lib-Dem)
Liberal Democrat national policy is to adopt the Royal Commission on Pollution proposal for 10 percent of all journeys to be made by bicycle by 2005, to be achieved by: a) developing integrated local and national cycling strategies, funded by reduced expenditure on road-building, and b) a requirement for all schemes for new roads or road changes to promote cycling where possible. I would also push for grants or credit approval to be extended to councils to build not only cycle routes but also infrastructure e.g. secure cycle racks at shopping centres and stations. To help cyclists start young, I would push for councils to work with schools in setting up safe cycle routes to school.
Safeway: I do not support this environmentally unsustainable development. It will severely damage shops in Leopold and Arthur roads, and the increase in traffic will be horrendous in an area already burdened with many lorries and three weak bridges.
Tom Walsh
(Green)
Safety is a key problem for cyclists - and so is the fact that you need somewhere at the end of your journey where you can safely store your bike. I'd like to see cycling becoming included in people's thinking as a mainstream form of transport when it comes to planning. There can be a bias towards cycling, rather than just seeing how it can take a place along with other forms of transport. Cycle routes are essential but they are not the end of the problem. An awareness programme would be handy - telling people where they can cycle safely. And every schoolchild should do a course on cycle safety.
Safeway: this would be a honeypot development that everyone would flock to, making the area more congested and more dangerous to road users and pedestrians. Pollution will also rise and roads will be redeveloped. There is no overriding necessity for them to build such a big store instead of one that benefits a smaller radius - it is pure company greed. I would not object to something that met the needs of the local people. That would have to be worked out locally.
MITCHAM & MORDEN
Angela
Rumbold (current MP - Con)
I have always been in favour of cycling as a method of transportation, and am happy to support the local authority in any way I can to provide safer cycling for all of my constituents.
Safeway: I am against the introduction of any new superstores within town centres and the environment, since I believe we already have sufficient to support the local community, and was sorry to see Plough Lane taken away from what I believe to be its proper use as a ground for sport. Nonetheless, I do believe that the local authority should now concentrate on maintaining and preserving open space and sports facilities for the local people.
Siobhain
McDonagh (Lab)
Cycling provides the greatest potential for reducing the 60 percent of journeys of between one and five miles presently undertaken by car. It is these car journeys that disproportionately contribute to pollution, and their reduction would therefore lead to substantial health and environmental benefits. The assumption that Britain cannot be encouraged onto bikes is wrong. Under Labour, local authorities will be encouraged to include cycling provisions in their transport bids to the Dept of Transport to create a network of safe cycling routes. Cycling on the streets will be encouraged through traffic calming measures, and cycle-and-ride schemes will be encouraged through secure parking at stations and major bus termini. Where possible, Labour will ensure that trains carry bikes free of charge.
Safeway: I do not have a policy line on this, as it is a planning application outside the constituency.
Nick
Harris (Lib-Dem)
I wholeheartedly support my party's aim of increasing the proportion of journeys made by bicycle to 10 percent by 2005. I am particularly keen on initiatives which have the maximum impact on reducing car traffic, with its resultant congestion and pollution - for example, schemes to establish safe cycle routes to schools. I believe that cyclists' needs should be catered for in all road planning. But I am keen to see resources concentrated on finding solutions for cyclists on roads between popular destinations which are particularly difficult or dangerous, rather than designating relatively safe roads as cycle routes just to be able to say that so many miles of tracks have been created. I would also like to see better design and public consultation. Some cycle tracks have been hastily constructed, leading to faults which inconvenience cyclists and other residents.
Safeway: I oppose the proposed development because of the traffic congestion it will cause and because there are already sufficient similar stores in the vicinity.
Rajeev
Thacker (Green)
Cycling is healthy, clean and fun but can only be so if the environment complements these qualities. Of course, there will be times when using a cycle is impracticable. But as the experience of much of continental Europe shows, there is no reason why it cannot be used for a relatively large proportion of journeys. Green Party policy is clear. Facilities for cyclists would rank only below those for pedestrians and the disabled. This means more cycle paths (away from cars), a more pleasant environment in which to cycle, and cleaner and more efficient railways which would welcome cyclists who wish to travel out to the country to cycle.
Safeway: The Green Party is opposed to supermarket developments which, out of commercial necessity, must attract large numbers of people from a wide area. This inevitably means an increase in car-borne traffic in an already congested and polluted area. The site could be put to a number of uses which would be far more beneficial to the community, such as a community and leisure centre. Do we really need a further supermarket?