Back to previous issue Forward to next issue

MCC News, Issue 47, Aug-Sept 2007

Tour de France 2007 made a great start in London!

Photos and report by Duncan Harper

Incredible! What a 07/07/07! The Tour de France Prologue in Central London, on Saturday 7th July 2007, made for a very interesting and successful day. In the morning, we met up with other MCC cyclists in Wimbledon town centre. We then cycled together towards Hyde Park in one large group.


On arrival, we parked our bikes in a special temporary bike park (which could hold up to 11,000 bikes) provided by the GLA. Our group then broke up and we went on separately from there. My friend and I went to the People’s Village to stroll around the French and English themed food stalls. Other stalls included information about bicycle culture and there was also a dedicated LCC stall.

After sitting on the grass and eating lunch, we went to the viewing area at Hyde Park Corner, specially reserved for LCC members and their friends. This turned out to be a large roundabout island covered in trees and grass, along with safety barriers doubling up as a seating area. There was also a large TV screen and a number of portacabin toilets, plus a couple of policemen and litter-pickers; all specially provided for us!

We watched the Prologue on the the large TV screen and took a number of photos as the professional cyclists raced past us at 35 mph (55kph). I then met and talked to some London Cycling Campaign members who I knew, and relaxed on the grass and talked with my friend.


After the Prologue had finished we left the island to collect our bicycles, and cycled along various empty roads around Whitehall (closed for the weekend because of the Tour).

I certainly enjoyed the day and felt very privileged to be there, especially with the reserved area for LCC members. A big thank you to the LCC Office and Ken Livingstone for this! The weather was beautiful too. Amazing!

Compulsory Helmets:

a recipe for less cycling and more dangerous road conditions for cyclists

In response to an item in MCC News 45, like most cycle campaigners, I am firmly against compulsory helmets for cyclists.  This personal view is also the policy position of the LCC, the CTC, and the European Cyclists Federation.  It is difficult to sum up in a few words here the plethora of research evidence which underpins this position, so I will highlight very briefly what I think are the strongest arguments.

A law making it compulsory for cyclists to wear helmets would reduce the number of cyclists. In 1991, bicycle helmets were made compulsory in Australia and New Zealand and 30-40% of cyclists gave up cycling as a direct result.  Fewer people cycling leads to an increase in deaths from heart disease and other illnesses associated with a sedentary lifestyle, as well as less safe roads for people who continue to cycle, because motorists are less used to accommodating cyclists.  Dr Mayer Hillman, writing for the BMA in 1992, calculated that life years gained by cycling outweigh life years lost in cycle crashes by 20 to 1.

There is no evidence, other than anecdote, that cycle helmets deliver protection for cyclists against anything more severe than a minor bump.  Scientific research evidence shows that wherever helmet-wearing rates have been driven up (whether through promotional campaigns or, worse still, laws banning cycling without helmets), the reduction in cycle use has been equal to or greater than any fall in cycle casualties.

This not only means that valuable health benefits have been lost, but also that, in many cases, the risk for those who continue cycling has actually got worse.

The countries with the lowest risk of cycling injuries are those where helmet use is minimal, eg Netherlands and Denmark.  These countries also have the highest levels of bicycle use.  They have chosen to create safer road conditions rather than promote the wearing of cycle helmets. 

The most effective way to reduce the likelihood of injury when cycling is to increase the number of people who cycle.  The best way to achieve that is to make all roads safer for cycling by cutting both the volume and speed of motor traffic, and introduce laws which place more responsibility on those who pose the greatest dangers: motorists.

Helmet wearing should remain a matter of personal individual choice; it must never become compulsory.

Useful websites

http://cyclehelmets.org/

http://www.lcc.org.uk/index.asp?PageID=211

http://tinyurl.com/27k44j

http://tinyurl.com/2ffhof

Richard Evans

 

Bike Security

In order to reduce the possibility of having your bike stolen there are a number of preventative measures you can take: -

Record and register your bike with www.immobilise.com - this will assist police in returning recovered bikes to their rightful owners.

Take a colour photograph of your bike and make a written record of its description, including any unique features, so that an accurate description can be given if it’s stolen.

Security mark your bike and make sure that: -

- There is a clear indication of the fact that the bike is tagged or marked

- Use ‘tamper-resistant’ labels, etching or an inaccessible electronic tag

- Marking should be placed in two separate locations and at least one of these should not be clearly visible

·         Mark your bike with your postcode and house number

At home secure your bike to an immovable object or consider installing a floor or

wall-mounted anchor lock for extra security; more than half of all bike thefts take

place from an owner’s property so a few simple crime prevention methods can

lessen your chances of having your bike stolen. When you use your bike don’t lock it in the same place on a regular basis – so it won’t be noticed and stolen to order.

Lock both wheels and the frame together taking any smaller parts and accessories that can be removed without tools, with you, e.g. lights, pumps, panniers and quick-release saddles etc, or fit security fasteners on items such as wheels and seat posts.

There are a number of different products on the market, and price is not necessarily a reliable indicator of quality. The most important factor is how long the product can resist attack. You should look for products that have been tested against attack. www.soldsecure.com is a Police and Home Office backed initiative administered by the Master Locksmiths Association dealing with the assessment of security products.

To guard against the opportunist thief you need a product that has resisted attack for at least one minute, to guard against the determined thief you need a product that has resisted attack for three minutes and to guard against the dedicated thief you need a product that has resisted attack for five minutes.

If you have you bike stolen, you can report the theft online, by phone or in person at your local police station.

For any further advice contact Merton Police Crime Reduction Office on 020 8649 3245.

Crime Reduction Officer / CPDA

Merton Borough

Metropolitan Police

 

T-Shirt is a piece of artwork

Wimbledon Racquets and Fitness club wanted to try something different for their Bike Week event on 16th June. They hired local artist and London Cycling Campaign member Heather Shepherd to run a cycling themed art workshop.

Heather has her own business called Artcycle and usually helps children in schools create works of art by recycling junk. For the club event she brought along 30 plain white T-shirts and using Hi-Viz paint children were able to create their own designs. Children who were at the club playing in their badminton session had a break from their games to have a go at creating their own work of art.

The paint just about dried in time before the children resumed their badminton matches wearing their new colourful T-shirts. The event was so popular the T-shirts ran out and Heather had to quickly send out for more.

The attached photo shows a young badminton player proudly wearing his new T-shirt and admiring the other efforts.


Fred Ellis

Wimbledon Racquets and Fitness Club